(Photo by Getty Images. Chien-Ming Wang? Sure, why not. Just check your Wang jokes at the door, okay?)
We'll leave the dick jokes to the headline writers at MLB.com ("Nationals 'aggressively pursuing' Wang"), and MASN ("A Wang worth the wait").
But MLB.com's Bill Ladson reported today that the Nats are ''aggressively pursuing" Chien-Ming Wang:
The Nationals are "aggressively pursuing" free-agent right-hander Chien-Ming Wang, according to a baseball source. It's not certain whether Washington has formally extended an offer just yet.
As of 3:09 this afternoon, Ken Rosenthal reported that several teams have offered money for Wang (*snicker*, *snicker*):
Wang, 30, has received offers from two other, unidentified clubs, according to a major-league source. He likely will make a decision within 7 to 10 days, the source said
If the Nats are one of these teams, or will be making an offer soon: fine. We're all for Mike Rizzo combing the scrap heap for reclamation projects. But barring a big trade, the Nats have made just one upgrade for the 2010 starting rotation: Jason Marquis.
Wasn't starting pitching Mike Rizzo's #1 priority coming into the offseason? Swear we read a quote along those lines at some point. Seems appropriate considering Nats starters ranked worst in every conceivable category in 2009.
With the snow falling here in DC and Nats pitchers and catchers reporting in just over a week, it looks like Mike Rizzo is done with upgrades. It's all retreads from here. That's why the Nationals are looking to pay for Wang. Couldn't help that one.
By the way, when is that Livan Hernandez re-introductory press conference happening, anyway?
Befriend the Nationals Enquirer on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.
Wang is much better than you give him credit for, as he had very solid success in the AL East. He's not a retread. He has an injury history, but if the price is right, this could be a steal.
And Marquis blows.
Posted by: Jon | February 10, 2010 at 09:35 AM
Jon,
We're not questioning Wang's past success at all.
But, yes, Wang is broken. And yes, he could be a steal at the right price if he recovers okay from surgery. I guess to be clear we should have said: "...it looks like Mike Rizzo is done with upgrades. It's all retreads and reclamation projects from here."
That's our biggest complaint at the moment; well, besides the blizzard howling outside: we were sort of expecting a few actual upgrades in the starting rotation this year, and once again it looks like more of the same.
Posted by: The Nationals Enquirer | February 10, 2010 at 10:20 AM
I get what you're saying, but I still think you are underestimating his upside. That's the difference. In the past, we've signed reclamation projects with limited upside, to say the least. For example, Scott Olsen probably performed about as well as he could have last year after a steady decline in production.
I do see this as a better move (if it happens) than anything we've done in the past to address the rotation. Just my thoughts.
Posted by: Jon | February 10, 2010 at 01:32 PM
Gotta imagine the Dodgers have the advantage in these negotiations, b/c Torre and Pac Rim proximity.
Posted by: DKSW | February 10, 2010 at 01:59 PM
Let's see. We have Lanan. We have Marquis. If Olsen recovers we have a No. 3. The rookies from last year could fight out for the final spot, but we need a second new arm besides Marquis.
Posted by: David | February 10, 2010 at 06:07 PM
Three possible #3 arms. Chico, Olsen, Wang (if he signs), it'll probably be JD Martin ... bet you wish your girlfriend was as hot!
Posted by: peric | February 10, 2010 at 06:29 PM
@Jon, good point on comparing the *upside* of past reclamation projects...though you really could've driven the point home by naming Daniel Cabrera rather than Olsen. Wang is an intriguing option.
@DKWS: apparently, the Dodgers dropped out of the Wang race today.
@peric: Matt Chico #3. See? We're f@^ked!
Posted by: The Nationals Enquirer | February 10, 2010 at 08:44 PM
a former #1 from the AL east can certainly help a cellar dwelling NL east team any day.
baby steps.
Posted by: Eric | February 11, 2010 at 10:05 AM